3 Featured Modules

1. Getting Started

1.1 Choose Your Billing Path

Before diving into the details, determine which billing process applies to your situation:

Hospital/Facility Billing – For billing facility fees in hospital outpatient settings:

  • Bills for equipment, room, technical staff
  • Uses standard hospital outpatient methodology
  • Maps to APC 5734 with established payment rates

Provider/Professional Billing – For billing physician or other provider professional fees:

  • Bills for physician interpretation and clinical decision-making
  • Requires crosswalk methodology due to no established RVUs

1.2 Hospital vs Provider Decision Tree

What are you billing for?

Hospital facility fees (equipment, room, tech staff)? → Go to Section 2: Hospital Facility Billing

Physician professional fees (interpretation, clinical decisions)? → Go to Section 3: Provider Professional Billing

Both facility and professional components? → Use both Section 2 and Section 3 for respective components

1.3 CPT Code Overview

CPT Codes for ECG-AI LEF:

  • 0764T: Assistive algorithmic ECG analysis; concurrent with ECG (add-on code)
  • 0765T: Assistive algorithmic ECG analysis; previously performed ECG (stand-alone code)

Code Selection Decision:

  • Same-day ECG + ECG-AI LEF analysis: Use 0764T
  • ECG-AI LEF analysis of previous ECG: Use 0765T

2. Hospital Facility Billing

2.1 Overview and Process

Hospital facility billing for ECG-AI LEF follows standard outpatient procedures using established APC methodology.

Process Characteristics:

  • Standard APC methodology – Uses established Medicare payment classifications
  • Established payment rates – APC 5734 provides predictable reimbursement
  • Standard processing – Follows normal hospital billing workflows
  • Basic documentation – Standard facility requirements
  • Routine charge master setup – Treat like any other outpatient procedure

2.2 APC 5734 Classification

CPT Code Assignment:

  • 0764T: Assistive algorithmic ECG analysis; concurrent with ECG
  • 0765T: Assistive algorithmic ECG analysis; previously performed ECG

APC Classification: Both 0764T and 0765T map to APC 5734

  • APC 5734: Level 4 Clinic Visits
  • 2025 Payment Rate: $128.90 (Medicare national average, varies with  geographic adjustment)
  • Relative Weight: 1.812
  • Status Indicator: T (Procedure paid under OPPS)

Payment Structure: Hospital Outpatient Payment = Base APC Rate × Geographic Adjustment × Relative Weight

Example Calculation: $71.14 (Base) × 1.05 (Geographic) × 1.812 (Weight) = ~$135

2.3 Charge Master Setup

Charge Description Master (CDM) Entries:

For 0764T:

  • Description: “ECG-AI Analysis – Concurrent”
  • CPT Code: 0764T
  • Revenue Code: 0636 (EKG/ECG)
  • APC: 5734
  • Department: Cardiology/EKG Lab
  • Charge Amount: [Hospital-specific rate]

For 0765T:

  • Description: “ECG-AI Analysis – Previous ECG”
  • CPT Code: 0765T
  • Revenue Code: 0636 (EKG/ECG)
  • APC: 5734
  • Department: Cardiology/EKG Lab
  • Charge Amount: [Hospital-specific rate]

Charge Setting Considerations:

  • Cost-based approach: Calculate actual costs (equipment, staff, overhead)
  • Market positioning: Consider competitive rates in your market
  • Payer mix analysis: Account for different payer reimbursement levels
  • Annual review: Update charges per standard hospital process

2.4 Standard Billing Process

Step 1: Service Documentation

  • ECG-AI LEF analysis performed and documented
  • Basic clinical indication noted
  • Technical quality verified
  • Results communicated to ordering physician

Step 2: Charge Entry

  • Select appropriate CPT code (0764T or 0765T)
  • Enter via standard charge entry process
  • Verify patient registration complete
  • Confirm insurance information

Step 3: Billing Submission (Standard process)

  • Include in routine hospital claim batch
  • Use standard UB-04 claim form
  • Follow normal facility billing workflow
  • Apply standard edits and audits

2.5 Documentation Requirements

Clinical Documentation:

  • Basic indication: Why ECG-AI LEF analysis was performed
  • Clinical context: Relevant patient symptoms or risk factors
  • Results summary: ECG-AI LEF analysis findings
  • Clinical impact: How results influenced care (brief note)

Technical Documentation:

  • Service date and time
  • Performing technologist (if applicable)
  • Equipment used
  • Quality verification completed

Administrative Documentation:

  • Physician order for ECG-AI LEF analysis
  • Patient consent (per facility policy)
  • Insurance verification completed

Example Procedure Note Template:

ECG-AI LEF ANALYSIS – FACILITY DOCUMENTATION

Date: [MM/DD/YYYY] Time: [HH:MM] Location: [Department]

INDICATION:

☐ Cardiac risk assessment

☐ Heart failure screening

☐ Pre-operative evaluation

☐ Other: [Specify]

 

PROCEDURE: 12-lead ECG obtained and analyzed using Anumana ECG-AI LEF technology.

2.6 Procedure Outcomes (Choose Based on Result Obtained)

Successful Positive Result

Device Output

  • Output: YES
  • Displayed Result: Low LVEF Detected
  • Interpretation Statement: Low Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction detected based on analysis of input ECG waveform.
  • Follow-up Recommendation: Further clinical evaluation suggested in order to establish diagnosis of Low LVEF. ECG-AI Low Ejection Fraction 12-Lead algorithm analysis should be applied jointly with clinical judgment.

Device Name: ECG-AI Low Ejection Fraction 12-Lead algorithm

Unique Device Identifier: (01)00860007426445(8012)V2.4.0

 

Successful Negative Result

Device Output

  • Output: NO
  • Displayed Result: Low LVEF Not Detected
  • Interpretation Statement: Low Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction NOT detected based on analysis of input ECG waveform.
  • Follow-up Recommendation: This result does not rule out Low LVEF. In addition to the ECG-AI Low Ejection Fraction 12-Lead algorithm analysis, clinical judgment should be used to obtain further noninvasive evaluation of LVEF if clinically indicated.

Device Name: ECG-AI Low Ejection Fraction 12-Lead algorithm

Unique Device Identifier: (01)00860007426445(8012)V2.4.0

 

Unsuccessful Completion

Device Output

  • Output: null
  • Displayed Result: Error
  • Interpretation Statement: The input ECG waveform does not meet the quality criteria and cannot be processed by the ECG-AI LEF 12-Lead algorithm.
  • Follow-up Recommendation: null

Device Name: ECG-AI Low Ejection Fraction 12-Lead algorithm

Unique Device Identifier: (01)00860007426445(8012)V2.4.0

 

Completion

Key Fields for ECG-AI LEF:

Revenue Code Lines:

  • Line 1: Revenue Code 0636 (EKG/ECG)
  • HCPCS/CPT: 0764T or 0765T
  • Service Date: Date of ECG-AI LEF analysis
  • Units: 1
  • Charges: Per charge master

Diagnosis Coding: Primary Diagnosis Options:

  • I50.9 (Heart failure, unspecified)
  • I25.5 (Ischemic cardiomyopathy)
  • R94.31 (Abnormal ECG)
  • Z13.6 (Screening for cardiovascular disorders)

Other Required Fields:

  • Standard patient demographics
  • Insurance information
  • Attending physician NPI
  • Service facility information

2.7 Estimated Outcomes (based on experience to date)

Claims Processing – Performance Benchmarks:

Metric

Target

Typical Range

Approval Rate

>90%

85-95%

Payment Rate

95% of APC

90-100%

Processing Time

14-21 days

10-30 days

Denial Rate

<10%

5-15%

Success Factors:

  • Clean documentation – Basic but complete clinical notes
  • Accurate coding – Correct 0764T vs 0765T selection
  • Timely submission – Standard facility billing timelines
  • Proper charge capture – Consistent charge entry processes

Areas to Monitor:

  • High denial rates – May indicate documentation issues
  • Payment delays – Could suggest payer education needs
  • Coding errors – Requires staff training
  • Charge capture misses – Need process improvements

2.8 Implementation Checklist

Pre-Implementation:

  • Charge master setup completed
  • Staff training conducted
  • Documentation templates created
  • Quality assurance processes established
  • Payer contracts reviewed

Go-Live:

  • First cases documented and billed
  • Daily monitoring of charges and documentation
  • Weekly review of early outcomes
  • Staff feedback collection and response

Post-Implementation:

  • Monthly performance review (include Anumana representative)
  • Quarterly benchmarking against targets
  • Annual process optimization
  • Ongoing staff development

3. Provider Professional Billing

3.1 Professional Billing Requirements

Category III CPT codes (0764T and 0765T) require specific attention:

  • No assigned RVUs – Medicare and payers have not established payment rates
  • No standardized coverage – Each payer decides individually
  • Potential for denials – Unfamiliar codes often get denied automatically
  • Documentation – Requires justification

3.2 Crosswalk Billing Solution

Crosswalk billing bridges the gap by demonstrating equivalent value to established procedures. Payers are familiar with these processes.

How It Works:

  1. Compare Work Effort – Analyze physician time, complexity, and decision-making
  2. Document Practice Costs – Calculate equipment, staff, and administrative expenses
  3. Assess Risk Factors – Evaluate malpractice and liability considerations
  4. Reference Established CPT – Link to codes with known RVUs and payment rates
  5. Request Fair Payment – Justify reimbursement based on equivalent procedures

Key Benefits:

  • Higher Success Rates – Comprehensive justification reduces denials
  • Appropriate Payment – Fair reimbursement based on actual value delivered
  • Streamlined Process – Standardized approach across all payers
  • Audit Protection – Complete documentation supports compliance

3.3 Four-Phase Billing Process

Phase 1: Pre-Service

  • Prior Authorization – Secure payer approval when required
  • Medical Necessity – Document clinical rationale
  • Patient Assessment – Identify risk factors and indications

Phase 2: Service Delivery

  • ECG-AI LEF Analysis – Complete clinical service
  • Procedure Report – Record findings and clinical impact
  • Quality Review – Verify completeness and accuracy

Phase 3: Claims Preparation

  • Crosswalk Analysis – Select appropriate reference CPT code
  • Complete CMS-1500 – Accurate form completion with proper coding
  • Gather Documentation – Assemble all required supporting materials

Phase 4: Payer Communication

  • Submit Claims – Include comprehensive justification package
  • Follow Up – Track status and respond to payer questions

Appeals Process – Address denials with additional documentation

3.4 Estimated Outcomes (based on experience to date)

Realistic Expectations:

  • Payment Rate: 60-80% of crosswalk reference code allowable
  • Approval Time: 30-90 days for initial claims
  • Success Rate: 70-85% approval with proper documentation
  • Appeal Success: 80-90% with comprehensive justification

Factors for Success:

  • Complete Documentation – All required materials included
  • Strong Clinical Rationale – Clear medical necessity
  • Appropriate Crosswalk – Well-justified reference code selection
  • Persistent Follow-Up – Consistent payer communication

3.5 Getting Started Roadmap

New to ECG-AI LEF Billing?

Step 1: Learn the Process

  • Review the comprehensive documentation in Section 4
  • Study the template examples in Section 5
  • Understand the crosswalk methodology

Step 2: Prepare Your Team

  • Train billing staff on crosswalk methodology
  • Educate clinical staff on documentation requirements
  • Establish internal protocols and quality checks

Step 3: Start with One Claim

  • Select straightforward clinical scenario
  • Use all templates and checklists
  • Track time and outcomes for process improvement

Already Billing but Need Better Results?

Audit Your Current Process:

  • Review denial patterns and reasons
  • Analyze documentation completeness
  • Compare your crosswalk selections

Optimize Your Approach:

  • Strengthen medical necessity documentation
  • Improve payer communication strategies
  • Enhance clinical procedure reports